My journey to Kingston University and subsequently, the class on Design Thinking sought to answer one question for me; “how might I help youth owned-startups in Nigeria succeed against the odds they face on a daily basis?” This was important for me because I wanted to build a reputation in startup coaching or business advisory. I realized the first step to doing this was gaining a foundational and theoretical understanding of what a startup is, how they are built and what the keys to their successes are.
I looked forward to taking the module on Design Thinking because according to Ursrey, 2014, design thinking has to be the core of any business strategy or organizational change so as to be able to build a culture on solving problems using this approach.
Introduction to Design Thinking
My learning experience began with the startup weekend hackathon. We worked in groups on re-imagining community engagement in Surrey using Design Thinking principles as summarized by Razzouk and Shute, 2012. We engaged in the process of surgically identifying the problem and coming up with a solution by sourcing and understanding information, analyzing it and applying creativity to experiment, rapidly prototype models, gather feedback, and redesign”. The outcome of this process was a product called Surrey Connect!
Figure 1: Product flier for team innovation’s surrey connect

Building Teams
According to De Mol, 2019, “stellar teams have the right combination of hard and soft skills”. In teaming up to set up our real-world business, it was crucial for the team to be heterogeneous and have the right balance of skills, knowledge, and experience (Brenner and Uebernickel, 2016). Understanding our personas was a critical step to identifying and striking a balance in the team as we identified who we wanted to work with. Several materials were introduced to assist us with this process which includes personality tests and the “about me” tool. We also found out about ten different persons that are categorized under learning, building, and organizing and how each of these characters bring value to the team through creativity and innovation – the Ten Faces by Kelley and Littman, 2008.
Figure 2: Team Dt4 members’ individual strengths

Empathy in Design
“Empathy, integrative thinking, experimentalism and collaboration” are the various characteristics that design thinkers should have as explained by Brown, 2008. Empathy is also the first stage in the design thinking process, and it helps us, as designers, do away with preconceived notions of and gain insights into the thoughts and values that people hold on to.

Source: Adapted from Interaction-design.org
Empathy for target users of any product or service is key to its success. We were shown that a great way to better understand and map out the needs of extreme users was by using the empathy map by Gray, 2017. In trying out the tool in class with a simple toilet-trip experiment, I experienced first-hand, how a “routine” toilet trip (to me) was experienced differently by a visually-impaired person, a mute person and a robot.
As we attempted to solve challenges faced by shoppers with their shopping bags, the empathy map was a helpful tool for understanding why people preferred one bag above the other. This understanding was gotten through observation, direct engagement with users and listening. To deepen our understanding of the problems, we used the 5 Whys technique developed by Toyoda Sakichi Ohno (1993, cited in Brenner and Uebernickel, 2016, p.14), while maintaining a curious and open mindset.
Figure 3: Empathy Map by Team DT4

Design Inspiration
Every good designer draws inspiration from somewhere, something or someone, and to inspire our creative juices, we were given the opportunity to visit the design museum as a team. Our task was to identify three-major designs that stood out to us, identify the setting for it and speak on it. My major takeaway from that trip was that innovation did not necessarily always mean “radical” change; great innovations could also be incremental. The latter relates to doing what we do but better while the former deals with wildly transformational concepts or ideas. To further expand on my learning on this, I read the book- Managing Innovation by Tidd and Bessant, 2015.
This helped us during our ideation process as we developed our second and final product for our business-experience.
Failing and validated learning
We spent a lot of time, resources and effort developing the prototype of our first idea – a collapsible shopping trolley. We had gone taking dozens of pictures of shoppers’ bags at different malls in the town centre. We had spoken to a lot of people about their experience with their shopping bags; some persons worried about the environmental impact of the bags; some were concerned about the attractiveness while others worried about portability. At the end of the day, we had defined the problem, ideated and developed a prototype. We were saddened to find an almost exact replica of what we had designed on Amazon as we carried out an analysis of existing products.
Figure 4: Prototype of the collapsible shopping bag

It was a good learning point for us as it taught us the importance of failing fast. According to Ries, 2011, the top reasons for startups’ failure are – “the allure of a good plan, a solid strategy and thorough market research”. He opined that because startups face so much uncertainty, the traditional business management processes cannot be applied to them. Ries encourages startups to look at failure as “validated learning”. He went on to define it as “the process of demonstrating empirically that a team has discovered valuable truths about its present and future prospects”. Validated learning helps to prevent “wastage” for startups as resources such as time, funding and skills are relatively scarce.
This approach helped us understand that our current idea was not feasible in its current form. We moved on to identify and attempt to solve a different problem. As we worked on this new problem using the build-measure-learn feedback loop, we were able to quickly move past some stages faster than our previous product because we now knew what went wrong and at what point.
To get validation for a business idea, we learnt that having a minimum viable product was essential as it gives your target customers something tangible to interact with – a visual representation of your idea. By observing how people interact with your product/service, how often they use it, you are able to gain some useful insights on what iterations you need to make.
I believe this approach can be adapted to suit services as well and in the future, I intend to use validated learning to quickly eliminate approaches to delivering entrepreneurship training at scale to young people in remote communities in my country. I will acquire knowledge chunks through research on what training methods could be implemented, test the method with a small group (minimum viable product), come up with key metrics for evaluating the efficacy of that service, gain validated learning through the measurement of internal and external feedback.
Value Proposition Canvas
Our experience was completely different when we approached potential customers during our first trade fair and as we engaged with staff and residents of care homes to talk about our products as they were not interested in numbers but rather the value that expected to get from the product. One of the tools that helped us identify the value we were offering was the value proposition canvas (Thompson, 2013).
Customers have problems, desires, needs and wants. To be successful as a business, it is important that you create value for your customer group by addressing those concerns. Prior to this class on value proposition, I had focused more on the novelty of the solution. In developing the value map for your customers, there is a tendency to want to subscribe “pain relievers” for every pain identified in your customer group as we observed in the course of developing our product but Osterwalder et al, 2014, explain that no value proposition can effectively address all the needs and pains. They further explained that the goal of the value mapping was to focus on those needs and pains that mattered the most to the customer and strive to effectively alleviate those pains.
In utilizing the tool to solve the issue of loneliness among the elderly in care homes, we arrived at a 53-week interactive journal that helped to stimulate the recall of happy memories for the elderly. It addressed the needs of social interaction, the fears of isolation.
Figure 5: First version of our value proposition canvas for Journal of Memoirs

Photo credit: The Author
Investor Pitch
Throughout the module, we had opportunities to talk to judges, coaches and business experts about our product. It was a bit intimidating at first because we were not exactly sure of what area of the business would be most focused on. After our first dragon’s den, we realized that the elevator pitch is what determines if people want to hear the rest of what you have to say. The elevator pitch could make or break any opportunity you have, to talk about your business.
One material that helped me understand what I needed to work on is the book “Here’s the Pitch” by Martin Soorjoo. I understood that there was a fine line between making your business idea appear desirable and appearing desperate. The most important thing to do is to state the facts of the problems you are trying to solve and give numbers to support your facts. Janiszewska and Insch, 2012, explain that “brand positioning determines the framework of visual and communication-related execution”. So, in pitching to your investors, you want to be able to clearly articulate your brand position.
As an entrepreneur, it is pertinent to have the numbers for your business at your finger-tips. These include but are not limited to demographic information, market size, pricing, and number of products sold to break-even. For example, we received questions such as “how many people live in care homes” “how many books will you need to sell to break even and at what price?
Our approach to mastering investor pitch:
- Understand the problem by applying the techniques on empathy.
- Research the industry
- Watch pitching videos on youtube
- Script the presentation and have everyone practice their lines.
- Practice with a timer.
Bonus point – In one of the competitions, we researched the judges to find out what experiences they had in our industry and assigned team members to address questions on specific topics. We won the golden ticket at the Bright Ideas Competition with that approach.
Summary
Team Collaboration: Could we have improved on our product? yes, but as a team, we experienced a lot of challenges on this journey; some of those challenges can be attributed to variance in personality types, differences in opinions, approach to work and scheduling issues. I do not believe that these challenges were only peculiar to our team, however, I do believe that it was our collective responsibility to resolve these issues.
Along the line, we found a way to leverage technology to solve major challenges we had around decision making through an anonymous voting system. Doodle was a useful application for voting on most suitable times, product names and preferred designs as it helped us move speedily on certain key decisions.
Figure 6: Team DT4 celebrating winning the Golden Ticket at the Bright Ideas Finals

Photo credit: Hamza Bajwa
Product Development: Some of the mistakes we made in product development stemmed from trying to appeal to a larger group of people as opposed to appealing to our target demographic. We embarked on a lot of design interations and colour schemes in the process of developing our journal. Looking back at it now, we could have saved our selves a lot of time by doing less “desk-top” research and asking the question – “what does the customer want?”.
Self-Awareness: Prior to this module, I have been quite “traditional” in my approach to businesses. I had previously associated business growth with the addition of offerings, added benefits instead of looking at it through the customers’ lens. I have come to realize that a little imperfection is okay and that not getting it right the first time, is also okay. One of the characteristics of an entrepreneur is the desire to have capacity, so as to act independently (Gasparski et al, 2011 p.14) ; this trait has influenced my work style for the longest time, but I now understand that a variance in the personalities of team members is good for creativity.
References
Brenner, W. and Uebernickel, F. (2016) Design Thinking for Innovation – Research and Practice. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Brenner, W. and Uebernickel, F. (2016) Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice. Illustrated edn. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Brown, T. (June, 2008) Design Thinking. Available at: https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking (Accessed: April, 20).
Dam, R. F. and Yu, S. T. (2019) 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process. Available at: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process (Accessed: April, 21).
de Mol, E. (2019) What Makes a Successful Startup Team. Available at: https://hbr.org/2019/03/what-makes-a-successful-startup-team (Accessed: April, 19).
Gasparski, W., Ryan, L. and Kwiatkowski, S. (2011) Entrepreneurship Values and Responsibility. Re-print edn. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Gray, D. (2017) Updated Empathy Map Canvas. Available at: https://medium.com/the-xplane-collection/updated-empathy-map-canvas-46df22df3c8a (Accessed: April, 20).
Janiszewska, K. and Insch, A. (2012) ‘The strategic importance of brand positioning in the place brand concept: elements, structure and application capabilities’, Journal of International Studies, 5(1), pp. 9-19.
Kelley, T. and Littman, J. (2008) The Ten Faces of Innovation: Strategies for Heightening Creativity. Main edn. London: Profile Books.
Osterwalder, A. et al. (2014) Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want. illustrated, reprint edn. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Razzouk, R. and Shute, V. (2012) ‘What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?’, Review of Educational Research, 82(3), pp. 330-348.
Ries, E. (2011) The Lean Startup. Re-print edn. New York: Crown Business.
Soorjoo, M. (2012) Here’s the Pitch: How to Pitch Your Business to Anyone, Get Funded, and Win Clients. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Thomson, P. (2013) Value Proposition Canvas. Available at: https://www.peterjthomson.com/2013/11/value-proposition-canvas/ (Accessed: April, 21).
Ursrey, L. (2014) Why Design Thinking Should Be At The Core Of Your Business Strategy Development. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lawtonursrey/2014/06/04/14-design-thinking-esque-tips-some-approaches-to-problem-solving-work-better-than-others/#4e8c4d911627 (Accessed: April, 18).









